What is the relation between politics and globalization?

 

1. Summary

Political globalization is much more than just the "decline of the nation-state." According to Delanty and Rumford, it’s a complex process that changes how we organize space and time across national borders. They define it through a "relational dynamic" between three main things: global geopolitics, a global normative culture (like human rights), and polycentric networks. Basically, it means that while the state is still here, it now has to share its power with transnational networks, global movements, and international organizations. It's a shift from traditional national politics to a more "postnational" or "transnational" way of running the world.

2. Interesting and Unusual Points

One really interesting point is that political globalization isn't just one single "thing" or "reality," but rather a set of tensions. I found it surprising that the authors don't just focus on big governments; they also talk about how our "consciousness" of the world being compressed (space-time compression) is a huge part of politics now. Another cool idea is "polycentric networks"—the idea that power is no longer in one center (like a capital city) but is spread out across many different nodes globally, which makes the old map of political power look completely different today.

3. Concerns and Problems

A big concern mentioned in the text is the "dark side" of global civil society. While we usually think of global networks as being for good things like peace or human rights, the authors warn that these same transnational spaces can be used by "terrorists, traffickers, and organized crime." Because these groups aren't elected and lack accountability, they can actually undermine the global political order. There is also the problem of "fragmentation"—globalization might give some people more freedom, but it can also make the social world feel broken or lead to a loss of local autonomy.

4. Points for Discussion

It would be interesting to discuss whether the nation-state is actually disappearing or if it’s just transforming into something else. The text mentions "de-territorialization," so does that mean our loyalty to our country is being replaced by a "global citizenship"? Also, the authors point out that political conflicts used to be about "class," but now they are about "identity" and "rights to difference." Is this shift better for democracy, or does it just create more division? Finally, how can we make these "self-appointed" global actors more democratic and accountable to regular people?

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, political globalization has fundamentally changed the "rules of the game." It has created a world where politics happens both above and below the level of the state. While it opens up new opportunities for things like cosmopolitanism and human rights, it also brings new dangers like global crime and political instability. The main challenge for the future isn't just about managing states, but about figuring out how to balance governance, identity, and community in a world that is more interconnected—and more complicated—than ever before.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is globalization--Kim younggyun

 1) Summarize From what I understand, globalization is not merely an economic trend. It is a broad concept in which the world becomes increasingly interconnected on cultural, social, political, and even individual levels. Because globalization is such an all-encompassing idea, it is only natural that debates continue over its definition. This is exactly what made studying the concept of globalization difficult for me. That is why, like Robertson and White, I tried to understand globalization mainly through the two dimensions of increasing connectivity and growing consciousness. I find their approach persuasive. When internet, transportation, and trade expand, the connections between countries grow stronger, and naturally, people begin to perceive the world as a “single place.” 2) Interesting point What I found particularly interesting while studying globalization is that it does not simply lead to “one-sided homogenization.” I used to think of globalization only as the expansion of...
Read more

What is globalization? | Yun Shinji

1.   Summary It is difficult to define the concept of ‘globalization’ with a single meaning, as the term is used in various contexts with different implications. Sociologist Roland Robertson describes globalization as “the compression of the world and the intensification of consciousness of the world as a whole". Robertson and White further elaborate it as two main trends “an increase in global interconnectedness” and "an increase in global consciousness". In this way, globalization is a complex phenomenon in which the world becomes closely connected across borders, and it is used in multiple ways in different contexts. Globalization can be broadly divided into three dimensions cultural, political, and economic. Among them, cultural globalization is the phenomenon we experience most directly in our daily lives. For example, a cultural content that becomes popular can spread worldwide and be shared globally. However, this phenomenon also raises concerns about cultural hom...
Read more

What is globalization? (TRAN THUY NGA/ 짠 튀 응아)

What is globalization? 1. Summary of the Reading Roland Robertson and Kathleen E. White’s chapter “What Is Globalization?” offers a careful, multi-layered attempt to describe a phenomenon that has become both a powerful reality and an intensely debated concept. They begin by acknowledging that  globalization is an essentially contested concept : scholars from different parts of the world and from different disciplines approach it with varying assumptions and no single agreed-upon definition. The authors trace the word’s rise in public discourse: although the processes we now associate with globalization long-distance trade, migration, cultural exchange stretch back centuries, the term itself only became widely used after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the partial collapse of communism. This historical moment gave globalization a new political and economic resonance, yet its roots are far older. Robertson and White emphasize that debates often split between those who see g...
Read more