Blogging through Media Trends and Globalization (2025)

  1. What I understood from the reading When I first saw the term “political globalization,” I thought of cooperation between governments and international organizations. Those things seemed distant from ordinary life. After reading Gerard Delanty and Chris Rumford’s chapter, I began to see that the topic also concerns identity, participation, and whose decisions affect our lives. The authors explain political globalization through tensions between three processes: global geopolitics, global normative culture, and polycentric networks. I understand these as relationships of power between states, norms such as human rights and environmental responsibility, and political activity organized through multiple interconnected centres. These processes overlap and sometimes conflict. They do not simply produce one unified global political order. The argument I found most useful is that nation-states are being transformed rather than disappearing. States remain powerful, but they operate alo...

1. What I understood from the reading Before reading this chapter, if someone had asked me what globalization meant, I would probably have thought of studying abroad, international trade, and products available in different countries. These are visible examples and are fairly easy to explain. After reading Robertson and White’s “What Is Globalization?”, however, I think this understanding captures only part of the picture. The authors emphasize both increasing global connectivity and increasing global consciousness. I understand the first as how people actually become connected, and the second as how we become aware that we live in a shared world. Goods, people, and information crossing borders are part of connectivity. Beginning to consider events elsewhere in relation to our own lives involves a change in consciousness. However, recognizing that we are connected does not mean that we will agree. The chapter also reminds me that globalization cannot be understood through economics alo...

 1. Summary of the reading materials Globalization is the most influential social and cultural trend in the modern world. It breaks geographical limitations, connects every country and region closely, and allows people, goods, information, and various cultural forms to flow freely across national borders. Most people hold a simple stereotype toward globalization. They believe that globalization makes all parts of the world follow the same cultural trends, causing local traditional cultures to gradually lose their features and even disappear completely. Many people worry that cultural diversity will eventually be replaced by a single global cultural style. However, after learning and analyzing the reading materials, I realize that the relationship between culture and globalization is far more complex and balanced. Instead of being a one-way negative impact, their relationship is interactive, mutual-promoting, and two-sided. Globalization provides unprecedented convenient conditions ...

Summary: Does Globalization Simply Change Culture? In Cultural Globalization, John Tomlinson explains that globalization is not just about the economy or technology. Culture is also an important part of this process. What I found interesting is that culture is not simply changed by globalization. It can also influence how globalization develops. Tomlinson also explains that globalization does not mean everyone will end up having the same culture. For example, people in different countries might follow the same fashion trends, but they can still have their own ways of wearing and expressing them. I think this shows that people do not just copy everything they see from other cultures. Another important idea is deterritorialization. As I understand it, this means that we no longer have to be in a certain country to experience its culture. For example, I can watch Japanese movies or listen to American music while staying in Korea. These experiences can become part of my everyday life and i...

  Section 1: Summary of the Reading After reading John Tomlinson’s “Cultural Globalization,” the point I agreed with most was that consuming American products does not automatically make a person “Americanized.” Someone may drink Coca-Cola, eat at McDonald’s, watch Hollywood films, or play American games while still understanding them through local habits and values. Cultural globalization should not simply mean the whole world becoming one culture. Global connections spread products, brands, images, and lifestyles, but people do not receive them passively. They select, interpret, and change what comes from outside. Culture is therefore not only influenced by globalization; it also shapes how globalization develops locally. Tomlinson’s idea of deterritorialization explains how culture and experience are becoming less restricted by a fixed geographical area. Electronic media bring distant ideas and ways of life into daily life, but local culture does not disappear. Global and local ...

 1. Understanding from the class When I used to think about globalization, the first thing that came to mind was business. Multinational companies sell goods all over the world, and countries import and export products to each other. But after learning from the class, I realized globalization is far more than just international trade. Globalization means regions around the world are becoming more closely connected. People, information, ideas and culture can flow across national borders. It is not a one-way process where developed countries simply export things to developing countries. Cultures and ideas from different places meet and influence one another. Events happening in one place can affect ordinary people far away. Globalization connects every corner of the world into a big network, covering economy, politics, society and culture. I used to think events in one country would mainly affect its own people, but now I know this is not true. For example, a style of music, clothing...