What is the relation between economics and globalization?

 

1. Summary

Economic globalization is often described as a world run by "placeless" giants, but the reality is much more complex. Peter Dicken argues that the central actors in this process are Transnational Corporations (TNCs), which he defines as firms that can coordinate and control operations in more than one country, even if they don't own them. These corporations drive globalization through Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), which has grown much faster than world trade in recent decades. Rather than a simple global spread, economic globalization works through "webs of enterprise"—complex production networks that connect different parts of the world but are often concentrated in specific regions like Europe, North America, and East Asia.


2. Interesting and Unusual Points

One point I found really surprising is that most "global" corporations aren't actually that global. Even among the top 100 TNCs, the majority still keep more than half of their activities in their home country. Another cool idea is the "Born Global" firm. Unlike older companies that moved abroad slowly and in stages, these new entrepreneurial ventures operate internationally right from the start. I also liked the metaphor from the painter Marc Chagall: just as a painter always carries the "aroma" of their native land, TNCs remain deeply "embedded" in the culture and institutions of their home country, which shapes how they behave even when they are far away.


3. Concerns and Problems

A major problem mentioned is the "territorial asymmetry" between TNCs and states. Because states are fixed to one place but TNCs can move their operations around, corporations can use "regulatory arbitrage"—basically playing countries against each other to get lower taxes or fewer rules. There is also a big concern regarding labor. Since "labor power has to go home every night," workers are stuck in one place while TNCs have spatial flexibility, making it really hard for unions to bargain effectively. Finally, FDI is very uneven; most of it stays within rich countries, leaving many developing nations excluded from the main benefits of globalization.


4. Points for Discussion

It would be interesting to talk about whether the power of TNCs is actually "emasculating" the nation-state as some people claim, or if states still hold the upper hand. The text shows that states can still control access to their markets—like how China sets very strict rules for foreign auto companies. Another good topic for debate is the "New International Division of Labour". Are TNCs just "fleeing" to find cheap, unskilled labor, or is the search for highly skilled, well-educated workers in places like Bangalore becoming the more important trend? Lastly, how much can International Civil Society Organizations use the Internet to actually hold these massive corporations accountable?


5. Conclusion

In conclusion, the relation between economics and globalization is defined by the tension between global integration and local responsiveness. While TNCs are the primary shapers of the global economy, they do not possess "absolute power". They are still regulated by national states and influenced by the specific geographies of the places they operate in. Economic globalization isn't leading to one single, standardized type of business; instead, diversity remains the norm because corporations are always influenced by the social and cultural systems they come from.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is globalization--Kim younggyun

 1) Summarize From what I understand, globalization is not merely an economic trend. It is a broad concept in which the world becomes increasingly interconnected on cultural, social, political, and even individual levels. Because globalization is such an all-encompassing idea, it is only natural that debates continue over its definition. This is exactly what made studying the concept of globalization difficult for me. That is why, like Robertson and White, I tried to understand globalization mainly through the two dimensions of increasing connectivity and growing consciousness. I find their approach persuasive. When internet, transportation, and trade expand, the connections between countries grow stronger, and naturally, people begin to perceive the world as a “single place.” 2) Interesting point What I found particularly interesting while studying globalization is that it does not simply lead to “one-sided homogenization.” I used to think of globalization only as the expansion of...
Read more

What is globalization? | Yun Shinji

1.   Summary It is difficult to define the concept of ‘globalization’ with a single meaning, as the term is used in various contexts with different implications. Sociologist Roland Robertson describes globalization as “the compression of the world and the intensification of consciousness of the world as a whole". Robertson and White further elaborate it as two main trends “an increase in global interconnectedness” and "an increase in global consciousness". In this way, globalization is a complex phenomenon in which the world becomes closely connected across borders, and it is used in multiple ways in different contexts. Globalization can be broadly divided into three dimensions cultural, political, and economic. Among them, cultural globalization is the phenomenon we experience most directly in our daily lives. For example, a cultural content that becomes popular can spread worldwide and be shared globally. However, this phenomenon also raises concerns about cultural hom...
Read more

What is globalization? (TRAN THUY NGA/ 짠 튀 응아)

What is globalization? 1. Summary of the Reading Roland Robertson and Kathleen E. White’s chapter “What Is Globalization?” offers a careful, multi-layered attempt to describe a phenomenon that has become both a powerful reality and an intensely debated concept. They begin by acknowledging that  globalization is an essentially contested concept : scholars from different parts of the world and from different disciplines approach it with varying assumptions and no single agreed-upon definition. The authors trace the word’s rise in public discourse: although the processes we now associate with globalization long-distance trade, migration, cultural exchange stretch back centuries, the term itself only became widely used after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the partial collapse of communism. This historical moment gave globalization a new political and economic resonance, yet its roots are far older. Robertson and White emphasize that debates often split between those who see g...
Read more