What is the relation between economy and globalization? - Ju Sukyung
1. Summary
The modern economy cannot be explained without the concept of globalization. Rather than simply a cause-and-effect relationship, the two have a relationship that promotes each other's development and constantly reconstructs each other's structure. Globalization starts from economic causes. Since the 1980s, various profit-seeking activities of multinational corporations for a wider market, a cheaper and more efficient production environment, and innovative technologies across borders have opened the door to globalization. Here, a complex and huge production network called the global value chain was created. It maximized efficiency worldwide by distributing and combining all stages of production in each of the most efficient countries. As a result, each country's economy has become inseparable, and in the event of an economic crisis for a country, structural interdependence that could spread around the world has intensified. However, this relationship cannot be seen as a one-sided control of companies. It can still be seen that the state is the core of revising and adjusting the rules of globalization. The government tries to induce corporate behavior by attracting or limiting foreign investment through institutions such as labor regulation and environmental standards. In other words, companies bait and pressure the state, but the state maintains its bargaining power by providing fundamental resources such as territorial or advanced labor. Ultimately, globalization played the strongest role in economic growth, but its limitations are sometimes revealed whenever an economic structure shock, such as a financial crisis, occurs. Recently, there has been a movement to rebuild supply chains based on security or trust rather than efficiency. This shows that the dynamics and structural changes of the global economy can determine the speed and appearance of globalization.
2. What I interested
As I studied about this part, I found it interesting that globalization, as I summarized earlier, has brought economic benefits but also new weaknesses. First, I thought that the fact that economic activity was carried out at a very fast and unprecedented rate as technological advances made the physical distance between countries meaningless, but the labor force was still subject to various geographical restrictions such as visas and language shows that capital mobility and asymmetry. Second, I could see how weak a single supply chain strategy that is efficient and prioritized when a pandemic like COVID-19 occurs, that is, when an economic event occurs. I could see the paradoxical fact that globalization has provided great economic benefits but does not have the resilience of the system together. Third, it was also interesting that data and financial capital, unlike physical goods, almost immediately cross borders. I thought this created a new problem that the state could lose things like tax regulations and tax authority in the digital economy, even though it could control the trade of traditional goods.
3. Discussion Question
While efficiency and cost reduction were the main causes of globalization in the past, national security and reliability are now the new driving force behind the restructuring of supply chains. This shows that the economic foundation of globalization is shaking. In addition, great powers are strengthening their economic sovereignty by reorganizing supply chains under the pretext of security, but in this process, there is a risk that the economic gap between emerging countries that are excluded from the global value chain or are forced to set new standards will widen. So we can discuss what differentiated strategies should be taken for developing countries that relied heavily on existing GVC to avoid economic isolation and achieve sustainable growth amid the restructuring of supply chains centered on developed countries.
I wrote this essay myself, but I used ai to write words or sentence structures that I didn't know.
Comments
Post a Comment