What is the relationship between culture and globalization?      LYUKE  려가

 1. Summary

The relationship between culture and globalization is not a simple "impact-response" dynamic, but rather a dynamic of mutual constitution and co-evolution. Globalization is far more than an economic and political process; at its heart, it is a cultural process because it profoundly influences the creation, circulation, and formation of meaning and identity.

The conventional view often portrays culture as a passive victim of globalization, facing homogenization. However, culture actually functions as the active engine and medium through which globalization operates. Our daily cultural practices—from choosing clothing brands to using digital media for communication—are performative acts that construct and sustain global networks. Furthermore, globalization leads to deterritorialization, where cultural practices and identities are no longer confined to local geographical contexts. This does not erase local culture but reconfigures it, often leading to hybridization and the strengthening of local distinctiveness within a global framework. Consequently, identity is not eroded but becomes a pluralized repertoire, allowing individuals to navigate between local and global affiliations.

 2. An Interesting Point

A particularly interesting perspective is the reversal of the traditional power dynamic between culture and globalization.

We typically assume that a powerful global economic system imposes itself on local cultures. However, a compelling argument posits that the global market itself is fundamentally built upon countless everyday **cultural acts of meaning-making**. The decision to buy a pair of jeans, for instance, is not merely an economic transaction but a cultural performance answering the question, "How do I want to be seen?" The aggregation of these micro-level cultural choices is what constitutes and drives the macro system of global connectivity. This shifts the focus from culture as a static entity being eroded to culture as a pervasive, generative force that gives globalization its substance and direction.

 3. Concern and Discussion

A primary concern arising from this relationship is the tension between universalism and particularism. As globalization promotes universal values, human rights, and consumer culture, how can the integrity and distinctiveness of local cultural practices be preserved? Is there a risk that a form of "cultural imperialism" masked as universality could marginalize alternative worldviews?

This leads to a critical discussion: How do we balance the undeniably positive aspects of global interconnection—such as enhanced cross-cultural understanding and the formation of cosmopolitan solidarities—with the legitimate desire to protect cultural diversity? The solution may lie not in resisting globalization outright, but in fostering a reflexive globalization—one that recognizes the constructed nature of both universal values and cultural identities. By approaching identity as a flexible repertoire and universal principles as a framework for dialogue rather than imposition, we might navigate a path that simultaneously embraces global belonging and cherishes cultural difference.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is globalization--Kim younggyun

 1) Summarize From what I understand, globalization is not merely an economic trend. It is a broad concept in which the world becomes increasingly interconnected on cultural, social, political, and even individual levels. Because globalization is such an all-encompassing idea, it is only natural that debates continue over its definition. This is exactly what made studying the concept of globalization difficult for me. That is why, like Robertson and White, I tried to understand globalization mainly through the two dimensions of increasing connectivity and growing consciousness. I find their approach persuasive. When internet, transportation, and trade expand, the connections between countries grow stronger, and naturally, people begin to perceive the world as a “single place.” 2) Interesting point What I found particularly interesting while studying globalization is that it does not simply lead to “one-sided homogenization.” I used to think of globalization only as the expansion of...
Read more

What is globalization? | Yun Shinji

1.   Summary It is difficult to define the concept of ‘globalization’ with a single meaning, as the term is used in various contexts with different implications. Sociologist Roland Robertson describes globalization as “the compression of the world and the intensification of consciousness of the world as a whole". Robertson and White further elaborate it as two main trends “an increase in global interconnectedness” and "an increase in global consciousness". In this way, globalization is a complex phenomenon in which the world becomes closely connected across borders, and it is used in multiple ways in different contexts. Globalization can be broadly divided into three dimensions cultural, political, and economic. Among them, cultural globalization is the phenomenon we experience most directly in our daily lives. For example, a cultural content that becomes popular can spread worldwide and be shared globally. However, this phenomenon also raises concerns about cultural hom...
Read more

What is globalization? (TRAN THUY NGA/ 짠 튀 응아)

What is globalization? 1. Summary of the Reading Roland Robertson and Kathleen E. White’s chapter “What Is Globalization?” offers a careful, multi-layered attempt to describe a phenomenon that has become both a powerful reality and an intensely debated concept. They begin by acknowledging that  globalization is an essentially contested concept : scholars from different parts of the world and from different disciplines approach it with varying assumptions and no single agreed-upon definition. The authors trace the word’s rise in public discourse: although the processes we now associate with globalization long-distance trade, migration, cultural exchange stretch back centuries, the term itself only became widely used after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the partial collapse of communism. This historical moment gave globalization a new political and economic resonance, yet its roots are far older. Robertson and White emphasize that debates often split between those who see g...
Read more